1、问题现象
一台从库服务器的内存使用率持续上升,最终导致 MySQL 服务被 kill 了。
内存监控视图如下:
![如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题 图片[1]-如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题-不念博客](https://www.bunian.cn/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-145.png)
从图中可以看出,在 00:00 左右触发了 kill,然后又被mysqld_safe进程拉起,然后内存又会持续上升。
2、排查过程
基本信息
- 数据库版本:MySQL 5.7.32
- 操作系统版本:Ubuntu 20.04
- 主机配置:8C64GB
innodb_buffer_pool_size
:8G
由于用户环境未打开内存相关的监控,所以在 my.cnf
配置文件中配置如下:
performance-schema-instrument = 'memory/% = COUNTED'performance-schema-instrument = 'memory/% = COUNTED'performance-schema-instrument = 'memory/% = COUNTED'
打开内存监控等待运行一段时间后,相关视图查询如下:
![如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题 图片[2]-如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题-不念博客](https://www.bunian.cn/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/640-3-2.png)
![如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题 图片[3]-如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题-不念博客](https://www.bunian.cn/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-147.png)
从上述截图可以看到,MySQL 的 buffer pool 大小分配正常,但是 memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root 占用了 8GB 内存。
查看源代码的介绍:
![如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题 图片[4]-如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题-不念博客](https://www.bunian.cn/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-148.png)
sp_head:sp_head represents one instance of a stored program.It might be of any type (stored procedure, function, trigger, event).
根据源码的描述可知,sp_head
表示一个存储程序的实例,该实例可能是存储过程、函数、触发器或者定时任务。
查询当前环境存储过程与触发器数量:
![如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题 图片[5]-如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题-不念博客](https://www.bunian.cn/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-149.png)
![如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题 图片[6]-如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题-不念博客](https://www.bunian.cn/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-150.png)
当前环境存在大量的触发器与存储过程。
查询 MySQL 相关bug,这里面提到一句话:
![如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题 图片[7]-如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题-不念博客](https://www.bunian.cn/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-151.png)
Tried to tweak table_open_cache_instances to affect this?
查询此参数描述:
![如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题 图片[8]-如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题-不念博客](https://www.bunian.cn/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-152.png)
A value of 8 or 16 is recommended on systems that routinely use 16 or more cores. However, if you have many large triggers on your tables that cause a high memory load, the default setting for table_open_cache_instances might lead to excessive memory usage. In that situation, it can be helpful to set table_open_cache_instances to 1 in order to restrict memory usage.
根据官方的解释可以了解到,如果有许多大的触发器,参数 table_open_cache_instances
的默认值可能会造成内存使用过多。
比如 table_open_cache_instances
设置为 16,那么表缓存会划分为 16 个 table instance。当并发访问大时,最多的情况下一个表的缓存信息会出现在每一个 table instance 里面。
再有每次将表信息放入表缓存时,所有关联的触发器都被放入 memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root 中,table_open_cache_instances
设置的越大其所占内存也就越大,以及存储过程也会消耗更多的内存,所以导致内存一直上升最终导致 OOM。
下面简单验证一下触发器对内存的影响。
当 table_open_cache_instances
为 8 时:
#清空缓存mysql> flush tables;Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)[root@test ~]# cat test.shfor i in `seq 1 1 8`domysql -uroot -p test -e "select * from test;"done[root@test ~]# sh test.shmysql> show variables like '%table_open_cache_instances%';+----------------------------+-------+| Variable_name | Value |+----------------------------+-------+| table_open_cache_instances | 8 |+----------------------------+-------+1 row in set (0.00 sec)mysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root';+---------------+| current_alloc |+---------------+| 119.61 KiB |+---------------+1 row in set (0.00 sec)#清空缓存 mysql> flush tables; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) [root@test ~]# cat test.sh for i in `seq 1 1 8` do mysql -uroot -p test -e "select * from test;" done [root@test ~]# sh test.sh mysql> show variables like '%table_open_cache_instances%'; +----------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +----------------------------+-------+ | table_open_cache_instances | 8 | +----------------------------+-------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root'; +---------------+ | current_alloc | +---------------+ | 119.61 KiB | +---------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)#清空缓存 mysql> flush tables; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) [root@test ~]# cat test.sh for i in `seq 1 1 8` do mysql -uroot -p test -e "select * from test;" done [root@test ~]# sh test.sh mysql> show variables like '%table_open_cache_instances%'; +----------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +----------------------------+-------+ | table_open_cache_instances | 8 | +----------------------------+-------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root'; +---------------+ | current_alloc | +---------------+ | 119.61 KiB | +---------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
在该表上创建一个触发器。
mysql> \d|mysql> CREATE TRIGGER trigger_test BEFORE INSERT ON test FOR EACH ROW BEGIN SIGNAL SQLSTATE '45000' SET message_text='Very long string. MySQL stores table descriptors in a special memory buffer, calle'> at holds how many table descriptors MySQL should store in the cache and table_open_cache_instances t'> hat stores the number of the table cache instances. So with default values of table_open_cache=4000'> and table_open_cache_instances=16, you will have 16 independent memory buffers that will store 250 t'> able descriptors each. These table cache instances could be accessed concurrently, allowing DML to u'> se cached table descriptors without locking each other. If you use only tables, the table cache doe'> s not require a lot of memory, because descriptors are lightweight, and even if you significantly increased the value of table_open_cache, it would not be so high. For example, 4000 tables will take u'> p to 4000 x 4K = 16MB in the cache, 100.000 tables will take up to 390MB that is also not quite a hu'> ge number for this number of open tables. However, if your tables have triggers, it changes the gam'> e.'; END|Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)#清空缓存mysql> flush tables;Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)mysql> \d| mysql> CREATE TRIGGER trigger_test BEFORE INSERT ON test FOR EACH ROW BEGIN SIGNAL SQLSTATE '45000' SET message_text='Very long string. MySQL stores table descriptors in a special memory buffer, calle '> at holds how many table descriptors MySQL should store in the cache and table_open_cache_instances t '> hat stores the number of the table cache instances. So with default values of table_open_cache=4000 '> and table_open_cache_instances=16, you will have 16 independent memory buffers that will store 250 t '> able descriptors each. These table cache instances could be accessed concurrently, allowing DML to u '> se cached table descriptors without locking each other. If you use only tables, the table cache doe '> s not require a lot of memory, because descriptors are lightweight, and even if you significantly increased the value of table_open_cache, it would not be so high. For example, 4000 tables will take u '> p to 4000 x 4K = 16MB in the cache, 100.000 tables will take up to 390MB that is also not quite a hu '> ge number for this number of open tables. However, if your tables have triggers, it changes the gam '> e.'; END| Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) #清空缓存 mysql> flush tables; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)mysql> \d| mysql> CREATE TRIGGER trigger_test BEFORE INSERT ON test FOR EACH ROW BEGIN SIGNAL SQLSTATE '45000' SET message_text='Very long string. MySQL stores table descriptors in a special memory buffer, calle '> at holds how many table descriptors MySQL should store in the cache and table_open_cache_instances t '> hat stores the number of the table cache instances. So with default values of table_open_cache=4000 '> and table_open_cache_instances=16, you will have 16 independent memory buffers that will store 250 t '> able descriptors each. These table cache instances could be accessed concurrently, allowing DML to u '> se cached table descriptors without locking each other. If you use only tables, the table cache doe '> s not require a lot of memory, because descriptors are lightweight, and even if you significantly increased the value of table_open_cache, it would not be so high. For example, 4000 tables will take u '> p to 4000 x 4K = 16MB in the cache, 100.000 tables will take up to 390MB that is also not quite a hu '> ge number for this number of open tables. However, if your tables have triggers, it changes the gam '> e.'; END| Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) #清空缓存 mysql> flush tables; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
然后访问表,查看缓存。
[root@test ~]# cat test.shfor i in `seq 1 1 8`domysql -uroot -p test -e "select * from test;"done[root@test ~]# sh test.shmysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root';+---------------+| current_alloc |+---------------+| 438.98 KiB |+---------------+1 row in set (0.00 sec)[root@test ~]# cat test.sh for i in `seq 1 1 8` do mysql -uroot -p test -e "select * from test;" done [root@test ~]# sh test.sh mysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root'; +---------------+ | current_alloc | +---------------+ | 438.98 KiB | +---------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)[root@test ~]# cat test.sh for i in `seq 1 1 8` do mysql -uroot -p test -e "select * from test;" done [root@test ~]# sh test.sh mysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root'; +---------------+ | current_alloc | +---------------+ | 438.98 KiB | +---------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
可以发现 memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root 明显增长较大。如果有很多大的触发器,那么所占内存就不可忽视(现场环境触发器里面很多是调用了存储过程)。
当 table_open_cache_instances
为 1 时:
mysql> flush tables;Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)mysql> show variables like '%table_open_cache_instances%';+----------------------------+-------+| Variable_name | Value |+----------------------------+-------+| table_open_cache_instances | 1 |+----------------------------+-------+1 row in set (0.00 sec)SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root';+---------------+| current_alloc |+---------------+| 119.61 KiB |+---------------+1 row in set (0.00 sec)mysql> #访问表mysql> system sh test.shmysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root';+---------------+| current_alloc |+---------------+| 159.53 KiB |+---------------+1 row in set (0.00 sec)mysql> flush tables; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql> show variables like '%table_open_cache_instances%'; +----------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +----------------------------+-------+ | table_open_cache_instances | 1 | +----------------------------+-------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root'; +---------------+ | current_alloc | +---------------+ | 119.61 KiB | +---------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> #访问表 mysql> system sh test.sh mysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root'; +---------------+ | current_alloc | +---------------+ | 159.53 KiB | +---------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)mysql> flush tables; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql> show variables like '%table_open_cache_instances%'; +----------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +----------------------------+-------+ | table_open_cache_instances | 1 | +----------------------------+-------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root'; +---------------+ | current_alloc | +---------------+ | 119.61 KiB | +---------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> #访问表 mysql> system sh test.sh mysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root'; +---------------+ | current_alloc | +---------------+ | 159.53 KiB | +---------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
可以发现 memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root 所占内存增长较小。
由于大量触发器会导致表缓存和 memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root 占用更多的内存,根据实际环境,尝试把该从库的 table_open_cache_instances
修改为 1 后观察情况。
![如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题 图片[9]-如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题-不念博客](https://www.bunian.cn/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-153.png)
可以看到内存值趋于稳定,未再次出现内存使用率异常的问题。
3、总结
- MySQL 中不推荐使用大量的触发器以及复杂的存储过程。
table_open_cache_instances
设置为 1 时,在高并发下会影响 SQL 的执行效率。本案例的从库并发量不高,其他场景请根据实际情况进行调整。- 触发器越多会导致 memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root 占用的内存越大,存储过程所使用的内存也会越大。
- 本文只是给出了解决内存溢出的一个方向,具体的底层原理请自行探索。